Hi,
today I was working with javascript. I was trying to reuse my knowledge of .NET and OOP to build a webpage, but it didn't really worked:
... but never mind... let's see what I learned today. At first I realized that a function seems to be a good way to stick to OOP in javascript.
//-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
// class Credential
//-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
function Credential(userName, password) {
// Username
this.UserName = userName;
// Password encrypted
this.Password = password;
}
... as a C# developer my eyes were bleeding while I was staring at these lines of code (no data types and only these "functions"), but anyway, what we got is something like a class we can use with public members. Creating a "var x = new Credential('admin', 'password');" instantiates the class.
In the next step I created a Controller class for my webpage like this:
function PageController() {
}
and it simply seems to work as a class with no functionality. My next challenge was to add static members to this class, because I wanted to use this class as a static class only. I was surprised to add a variable outside of the function block, but with the following line it seem to work:
// stores username and password
PageController.CurrentCredentials = null;
today I was working with javascript. I was trying to reuse my knowledge of .NET and OOP to build a webpage, but it didn't really worked:
- Classes are functions (I think).
- IntelliSense in Visual Studio is bad.
- Using a loosely typed language makes it easy to fail.
... but never mind... let's see what I learned today. At first I realized that a function seems to be a good way to stick to OOP in javascript.
//-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
// class Credential
//-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
function Credential(userName, password) {
// Username
this.UserName = userName;
// Password encrypted
this.Password = password;
}
... as a C# developer my eyes were bleeding while I was staring at these lines of code (no data types and only these "functions"), but anyway, what we got is something like a class we can use with public members. Creating a "var x = new Credential('admin', 'password');" instantiates the class.
In the next step I created a Controller class for my webpage like this:
function PageController() {
}
and it simply seems to work as a class with no functionality. My next challenge was to add static members to this class, because I wanted to use this class as a static class only. I was surprised to add a variable outside of the function block, but with the following line it seem to work:
// stores username and password
PageController.CurrentCredentials = null;
and moreover I was even able to add non-static members from outside the function using PageController.prototype.XY... again something strange for the good old c# guy... So I added a function in the same way as I did with the member variable:
PageController.Main = function () {
}
This function was intended to build me the link between javascript and html (in the following my html-file):
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<title>ITADOS</title>
<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="main.css" />
<script type="text/javascript" src="PageController.js"></script>
</head>
<body onload="PageController.Main();">
<div id="PageControllerPlaceHolder"></div>
</body>
</html>
... as we can see here the control of the page will be handed over to the PageController in the onLoad method. I think it is the most proper way to call onLoad, because the whole page is already received and rendered when onLoad is called.
I extended the main method with some code to get the magic in there...
//-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
// static function Main
// This function is the entry point called by the html part.
//-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
PageController.Main = function () {
var content = "";
if(PageController.CurrentCredentials == null) {
content = "<h1>Login</h1>\n"+
"<div class='LoginBox'>\n" +
"<div>Username: <input type='text' id='username' /></div>\n" +
"<div>Password: <input type='password' id='password' /> <input type='button' value='Login' " +
"onclick='PageController.Login();'/></div>\n" +
"</div>\n" ;
} else {
content = "<img src='img.png'/>";
}
document.getElementById("PageControllerPlaceHolder").innerHTML = content;
}
what i did is:
- check if we are already logged in
- if so
- show an image as success message
- if not
- show a login box and add all the code necessary to proceed
- place the content to the html-div tag
Now for completness only I add this last function to the blog entry, but it is only a dummy test method:
//-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
// static function Login
// This function will be called when the credentials are submitted. It creates
// a user context and reinitializes the dashboard.
//-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
PageController.Login = function () {
// TODO: make the credential check by calling a remote service...
PageController.CurrentCredentials = new Credentials();
PageController.Main();
}
... so what we still haven't seen is the css file of the page:
body {
background-color: orange;
}
h1 {
margin-top:50px;
text-align: center;
}
div.LoginBox {
position:absolute;
left:50%;
width:300px;
padding:3px;
margin-left:-150px;
background-color:rgba(255,255,255,0.3)
}
... now the whole code is posted in the blog entry and we can summarize:
First thing to mention is that object oriented programming is absolutly possible in javascript. I saw a lot of possiblities e.g.: inheritance (by using: SpecialCredentials.prototype = new Credentials(); ), static vars and functions, public variables (using: this.VarName=value;), private variables (using var VarName = value;) and the same with private and public functions; and constructors. What I haven't found is: interfaces, abstract classes and protected methods, but there most be a reason why they built typescript (typescriptlang.org quote: TypeScript offers classes, modules, and interfaces to help you build robust components.) and maybe http://coffeescript.org/ should be mentioned here too as an other example of javascript derivates.
It is easy to start with javascript (using a lot of google-support) and easy to see results. What is absolutly awesome is this php approach using innerHTML and placeholder instead of php's if this-that echo "some-stuff". Every php-programmer will easily be able to build such a webapplicaion as seen above using the way to work he is used to. The cool thing here is that you have the code executed locally and so it is fast as hell without any need of reloading a whole page. A disadvantage is that you have no browser history (in such an approach) what I missed very hard while debugging the login page.
What was absolutly surprising to me was the fact that my chrome web tools provided a perfect debugging-IDE where I can see javascript errors, can set breakpoints, see variables and their state and values... After some research I found out that the guy, who developed firebug, moved to google to build these chrome toolsets. So there was no way for this tool not become awesome.
What I want to point out at last is the proper separation between html, javascript and css. In my example the html file is an empty page which says: I want this way to look (using a css file) and this kind of business logic (using a javascript file) and in the second step it simply hands over the control calling a javascript function (like Main in my example). The css here is a list of style information which will/can be used. The javascript code contains the actual business logic and enables the page to be dynamic and useful. The problem here is that you can't build a service in pure javascript because you need server-side code to e.g.: get data. My next project in javascript will be to find out how to get data from a server in an easy way using (I think) websockets...
Kind Regards,
Daniel
No comments:
Post a Comment